• spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh man, epic is such complicated garbage that even with a company brought in to set it up, the center I worked at during the rollout was a fucking mess. I left 14-18 months after initial deployment and they were still ironing bugs out, and I heard they rolled back within a year or so of leaving. Also, it’s almost hilarious how often I hear nurses bitching about using epic just when I have to go in for anything, and none of them are related to the place I worked.

    • Elextra@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I respectfully disagree after you try other EHRs like Cerner lol

      I also haven’t heard complaints about Epic with bugs at least in my org. They are pretty user friendly especially when we have some staff that can barely type. The only complaint was documentation. Nursing documentation was tedious with like over 250 options for “adult assessment” but they’ve slimed it down to like 50 earlier this year for my healthcare system. Lastly, I think things work better the more money hospitals put in the EHR. I was per diem for another healthcare system. It was pretty cool how many other features they had than ours.

      • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Must just be one of those “yeah my product is awful but have you seen the other guy?” sort of situations. I never had to use the EMR directly outside of troubleshooting, but both epic and the previous EMR were pretty garbage so I don’t really have a good baseline to go off of.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          The Acquired episode made it clear that the customer isn’t the people who use the software. Their customer is the CEO and the CIOs of hospital systems.

          • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            That would explain a lot. I’m pretty sure the CEO/CFO (can’t remember which) got let go for embezzlement or something a year or so after I was gone.

        • WFloyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          yeah my product is awful but have you seen the other guy

          Yeah, it’s this. I worked at Epic somewhat recently, and I’ve since worked with former Cerner/Oracle folks too. To Epic’s credit, they’ve never been acquired, and are better for it.

          There’s a lot of vocational awe across the board, people genuinely trying their best to make the product good. But healthcare is inherently complicated, because people are complicated. Each individual health system needs it customized to their specific needs, and over time this can get hairy to support. Add on to that that regulations and guidelines literally change every year, and it can become really hard to make headway on more meaningful changes when you’re just trying to stay compliant.

          This leads to burnout on the software support side, Epic churns through new hires like crazy - average tenure has been way down since COVID-19 (you can Google their response to that), so it’s a revolving door of 21-25 year olds keeping that ship afloat.

          Also, yes, insurance companies are the ones making the big money, by a mile.