Zaraki42@lemmy.ca to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agoReal self help.lemmy.caexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1476arrow-down143
arrow-up1433arrow-down1external-linkReal self help.lemmy.caZaraki42@lemmy.ca to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoScarily, I’ve stopped being able to tell most of the time. It used to be real easy. Granted, I’m not consciously looking for it, and I’m naturally trusting / semj-gullable so I don’t instinctively look for it either.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoIf it’s comic style it’s really obvious, at least to me. A good rule of thumb: if the background isn’t pure white and there’s no signature or anything indicating an author, it’s probably AI slop, especially if it’s a clean image.
Scarily, I’ve stopped being able to tell most of the time. It used to be real easy.
Granted, I’m not consciously looking for it, and I’m naturally trusting / semj-gullable so I don’t instinctively look for it either.
If it’s comic style it’s really obvious, at least to me. A good rule of thumb: if the background isn’t pure white and there’s no signature or anything indicating an author, it’s probably AI slop, especially if it’s a clean image.