The EU has agreed to impose retaliatory tariffs on €21bn (£18bn) of US goods, targeting farm produce and products from Republican states, in Europe’s first act of retaliation against Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The EU plans to introduce 25% tariffs on scores of goods from almonds to yachts, with the first duties being collected from 15 April, while the bulk apply from 15 May and the remainder from 1 December.

In a statement confirming the favourable vote by EU member states, the European Commission said: “The EU considers US tariffs unjustified and damaging, causing economic harm to both sides, as well as the global economy.”

The tariffs include US soya beans, grown abundantly in Louisiana, the home state of the House of Representatives speaker, Mike Johnson.

Ahead of the vote, analysis of the leaked list of customs codes by Politico found that EU duties would hit up to $13.5bn (£10.6bn) worth of exports from red states, including beef from Kansas and Nebraska, cigarettes from Florida and wood products from North Carolina, Georgia and Alabama.

The EU is facing calls to target US tech firms or banks in future retaliation, a potent but politically explosive target, as the US runs a €109bn (£94bn) trade surplus with the EU in service industries.

The outlook for negotiations is uncertain, amid questions over whether Trump’s goal is to create leverage over other countries – suggesting tariffs could be rolled back – or to raise revenues and reindustrialise the US, which points to their longevity.

Archive link

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          They are subsidiaries of US companies. You draft a list of wholly or majority US owned tech subsidiaries, and you tax them out of the wazoo, done.

          I’m sure tax and trade experts can come up with better approaches.

            • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              And I love impotent people.

              Governments can and do target individuals, see sanctions on russian oligarchs. How is your memory so bad?

              Plus, new tax rules are drafted every single year, to encourage or slap down specific stuff, why you acting like it’s impossible when it’s not even rare?

        • huppakee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          But they still ‘import’ the provided service. I wonder if they can actually manage to get a company like netflix to pay import duties on foreign (read: us) made content, but if they find a way we’re talking about a serious amount of money.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            A tax on tech services would crush the US economy. And to be honest, every country should be taxing outside tech services - its a substantial risk to just hand out that data to foreign corporations and a substantial risk of lock in.

            • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 days ago

              Yea it’s a better position to try and take them on IP control.

              I assume deals like this go out the window if they also mean Netflix Ireland can’t take Irish people to court for copyright infringement.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            No physical good crosses a border, which is the point when a tariff has to be paid normally. The cargo isn’t allowed into the country unless the tax is paid.

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              Internet sevice providers could easily be roped into policing this. If you have a website with a paid service you can charge them a fee based on their monthly rates or the ISP gets a shutout notice for your business. You could even compel visa and mastercard to snitch on their accounts to get accurate subscription numbers without hassle.