cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 19 days agoNew Mathlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1843arrow-down113
arrow-up1830arrow-down1external-linkNew Mathlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 19 days agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-squarejacksilver@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up62·18 days agoThis is clearly about the US stock market crashing. In that case it’s always the days gain/loss, in which case Yang is the only person who is right. This is important because a lot of people saw “down 10%” and now “up 10%” without realizing that’s still day over day loss.
minus-squareHollowNaught@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 days agoWhile the idea put forward by him is correct, stating that 100-10=90+9=99 is just entirely incorrect, hence why I’m saying they’re both somewhat correct
This is clearly about the US stock market crashing. In that case it’s always the days gain/loss, in which case Yang is the only person who is right.
This is important because a lot of people saw “down 10%” and now “up 10%” without realizing that’s still day over day loss.
While the idea put forward by him is correct, stating that 100-10=90+9=99 is just entirely incorrect, hence why I’m saying they’re both somewhat correct