Annoyed_🦀

Why would i engage with deflection? You’re not even trying to proof the finding wrong, merely justifying the reason, which is admitting human right violation indeed happened within China. And i have no desire to impress anyone from this instance.

So far it’s just deflecting and deflecting. Why not just straight away and tell me you don’t have any evidence to proof that China didn’t do what they got accused of? Might save us some time going back and forth.

If you actually went to Xinjiang and asked the Uyghur people themselves

When a country have such an abysmal score on human right and freedom of express, i’d take whatever people inside China said with a huge spoon of salt, as well as any country official that took the guided tour of the region. I’m not sure who will answer no when asked about whether they’re happy with no violence occuring, but i bet you can ask Israeli the same exact question before 7th oct and they will be happy that Palestinian are being kept in such way that violate the human right.

the UN put this to issue to bed two years ago

Refused to talk is put the issue to bed? Isn’t this like when US veto-ed all those ceasefire talk about Israel genocide?

I’m pretty sure if the same thing happened to ethnic minority in the US for the same reason, you will be up in arm against it. But sure, you do you.

Also yet to refute UN’s claim.

Lot of link, none of it seems to disprove the report UN released, most seems to claim that US use this issue as their advantage, and one even justify it with the same universally panned excuse US used to invade the middle east.

Seriously.

So you’re saying UN report is lying then? or is it because it’s not genocide yet, but human right violation that could be amount to crime against humanity?

Does that mean UN’s opinion of Israel is unfounded as well?

Who those power generated for? What those industrial processes making? And who those goods is delivered to? It’s all come down to over consumption.

We all need fuel to drive the car, if the oil is stopped today, what are people gonna do? They still have to change their behaviour regardless.

Same case everywhere. Stopping plastic and consumer has to change the way they purchase thing. Stopping beef industry and consumer has to eat less beef or eat another thing. It’s a cycle, most of that 90% emission that link to big company emission is directly correlated to how the consumer act. You can’t stop oil without first giving a viable alternative transportation everywhere, but you won’t get viable alternative transportation and a properly build town/city if people being a little bitch with NIMBY mindset and want everywhere to be accessible by car and refuse to walk.

That 10% created a demand that caused the 60% to happen. To decrease or even eliminate that 60%, the 10% have to change their behaviour as well, even after decades of being indoctrinated.

One of them is a tool, another one is driven by a tool.

Up is a Pixar animated film.