Unless there’s some method for you to help them become eligible to work in your country, you legally need to put the company’s safety first. If you give different reason to hide things you could be exposing your company to liability, so the safest option for both the company and for the applicant is for you to straight up ghost them.

I really hope you mean to say “hiring” instead of “hitting”

The simple answer is just don’t hire them, and don’t give any reason.

I mean, Facebook already requires ID in many cases. https://www.facebook.com/help/159096464162185/

You’re required to prove your age in a bunch of real life scenarios too, like buying alcohol, tobacco, or a firearm.

It is a privacy issue, but the question is on the balance is the privacy concern worse than the harms being done by youth on social media?

Given that there are literally hundreds of university studies showing how bad this shit is for kids, and leaked internal documents from the social media companies themselves, I think it’s the better choice at the moment.

The same way Australia is doing it, a big fine for companies that don’t comply and add an age verification process to sites.

Will it work 100%? No

Will it work enough? Probably

Title is wrong, both here and on the site. It’s 250 million not billion.

These companies are going to “announce” that they’re reshoring to the US, then drag every single heel they have until Trump leaves office.

There’s no way they actually bring the factories back, just to get screwed over completely when the tariffs are lifted by the next president.

He did make an exception for Russia though…

Not really, the formula they used to generate the percentages for each country means its not really intentional, the 10% is just countries the US import almost nothing from.

That’s not what I was taught or experienced firsthand while I was there.

It makes perfect sense, he’s asking for positive examples.

The vast majority of them are just fine, like with most tourists. The problem is there’s just massively large number of them in many tourist destinations compared to other countries (at least where I live), which means you more frequently see one acting poorly too.

The Americans are somewhat the same, we also get a lot of them.

That being said, even though most of the issues are because of sheer numbers it doesn’t mean there aren’t a few key cultural differences which can play a role in western locations being offended by Chinese behaviour.

The big one with China is that culturally there’s no expectation that you treat a stranger respectfully, the person you’re dealing with needs to earn your respect rather than having it by default. This comes across as quite rude to many other countries when you only have a single interaction with this person.

This isn’t a Chinese only issue though, Americans can also be quite rude depending on where they’re from and how they were raised, a good chunk of them are entitled assholes who think the world revolves around them when they visit.

It will not bring equality, it just reverts to might is right.

You asked what would it look like, and I gave you a realistic answer. There’s no way that type of economy could exist in the real world, it’s never been done, and there’s plenty of evidence showing it failing even in small groups of people.

Worked for millenia until the rise of capitalism

No it didn’t, we’ve had states for literally six to eight thousand years or more and capitalism for about three hundred years.

States have existed essentially since the moment the population of specific area became large enough to become a city.

Because again, as I said earlier, you can’t have completely stateless groups larger than hundreds of people, if just doesn’t work.

They don’t, mutualistic economics doesn’t work at scale because human nature doesn’t let it.

It can work with a small enough group, but will break before you even reach 1000 individuals.

It wouldn’t work, there wouldn’t be nearly enough contribution to cover a military with any useful amount of force. There’s zero chance you can get tens of millions of people to donate enough money voluntarily to support such an endeavor.

Militaries are extremely expensive, especially in the modern world. In Canada for example we have about 100,000 citizens per aircraft in the airforce, and about half a million citizens per boat in the Navy.

What the drunk…

It wouldn’t work.

In order to have a military, you’d have to have at least one or more dedicated people, those people would need to be supported with resources and given that it’s a stateless society there’s zero chance that enough people would voluntarily choose to help them to allow them to operate effectively outside of a wartime event without requiring some sort of payment from everyone and then you’re back to having a state.

Since when is renal failure a death sentence? We can keep people alive for decades without even having kidneys with regular hemo-dialysis machines. Kidney transplants are super common too.

I assume there are other significant injuries that aren’t fixable?

News flash, your assumption that they’re using secure phones is false.