Then they should be educated out of those ignorant views, not have their rights restricted. What are you gonna do when some wannabe fascist decides that “basic voting condition” means believing that trans people don’t exist, that climate change is a hoax, and that the ultra-wealthy shouldn’t pay any taxes actually?
The right to vote shouldn’t be restricted in any way. If you have legal restrictions then all it takes is bad actors expanding those categories and sorry, you just failed the critical thinking test because you think that climate change is real and life doesn’t begin at conception. Better get ready for your shift at Amazon, serf.
Media literacy and such should just be part of the education everyone gets.
Don’t ya just hate it when people make their harmful kink both their entire personality, and a problem for your fundamental rights? It feels weird to say it. But that’s basically what this performative Christian schtick is for people like this. They get off in it so now it’s all of our problem.
I think so. I looked up the definition quickly to be sure, and:
shamelessly immoral or debauched. wildly extravagant or wasteful.
I know they wouldn’t think so obviously. But a lot of that seems to fit pretty well I think the whole goal of “force whatever woman I can to be my own personal Bang Maid subject to all my whims,” kinda qualifies.
Oh yes, tie their ability to stay in the country to them staying in a marriage to someone who actively despises their existence…
Oh wait, that’s the “Greatness” a lot of these chuds want to bring back. The days before the country was “ruined” by “No-Fault Divorce” when women couldn’t have their own bank accounts and were at the mercy of their husbands/fathers… Right.
A bunch of comments going for the “why would you buy toilet paper that already has shit on it” route, but I can’t believe nobody went for calling this a shit(tickets) post.
Uh Eternity I think it’s called? Maybe I’ll give Voyager a try.
Luckily it would be really hard for them to actually get rid of it. I wouldn’t put it past them to try to start doing summary executions or just illegally trying to detain people without trial or whatever but there’s 0 chance they get the support to actually remove that amendment.
Mine is supposed to. Idk why it doesn’t sometimes. It’s only supposed to not be blurred if I’m scrolling inside an NSFW community. I’m pretty sure all the posts it’s happened with have been properly marked NSFW. But multiple times I’ve gotten jumpscared with it.
Yeah so far I’ve blocked a handful of furry pages and like 1 or 2 just plain old gay ones. Basically I barely want to acknowledge the existence of my own penis. So if I’m scrolling and a post suddenly jumpscares me with a face full of cock, I block.
Meanwhile I mostly browse All and running into the porn is how I know I’ve scrolled too deep. Such a variety of experience this place.
Nine a winner. Pay the front line, take the don’ts.
Yes that’s one of the actual pictures from the indictment they brought against him. He apparently had like 300 different documents of varying levels of classified status. There’s a couple more iirc of different places like a bedroom and a ballroom stage too. Basically it seems like he had his goons just hide anything he could get his hands on in random boxes of what were supposed to be just irrelevant personal effects
He was only indicted specifically for like 30 of them but my understanding is they specifically chose ones they were willing to have potentially entirely exposed.
I think I get what it’s saying? It’s saying that while your phone isn’t directly listening to your conversations in any meaningful way they collect crazy amounts of other data on basically everyone and can piece it together in such a way that they can make some scary accurate guesses as to the kind of ads to serve you based on what their systems have gathered your interests are and where/with whom you spend your time.
I’m not entirely sure. They didn’t really seem to present much more than speculation on it.