

Should we start advertising cigarettes again so? Because that went really well! /s
Should we start advertising cigarettes again so? Because that went really well! /s
That would be so good if they had a competent author.
Circumstances, adverse childhood experiences, can be huge factors. Experiments have shown mice choose to give up heroin for better living conditions, for example. It doesn’t mean that addiction doesn’t exist within us too. And that biological something needs a name.
Really interesting and specific, thank you. Interestingly I saw a parent online talking about how she plays the cartoons her kids watch at .75 speed. They were stressing her out and she probably suspected it wasn’t good for her kids either.
There are over 3,000 billionaires worldwide, with a combined net worth exceeding $16 trillion.
Even minding one’s own business while the world is as it is could be considered evil, with those kind of resources at their disposal
It’s possible, the first example in the linked video is of a young kid who has become addicted to YouTube. The content seems benign: animated nursery rhymes. But that case is presented with less detail on the exact usage. I’m curious what you’ll make of it. I’m halfway through.
Okay. I updated my original comment.
“It is unclear whether the technology staves off mental decline, or whether people with better cognitive skills simply use them more.”
It’s very early stages of the research then. In my experience elderly people use smartphones very differently to kids. Also, their personal development has past the formative stages so I imagine the devices cause less disruption.
There’s no doubt that they ruin the brains and lives of our kids though, as the research video posted on Lemmy.world recently makes clear.
Edit: Here it is. Brain scans show that screen addiction is the same as drug addiction as far as development of brain pathway changes and brain chemistry are concerned. Only difference is we haven’t had addicts this young and at this scale before. Memory, empathy, cognition and impulsivity are all impacted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ViT6LyLm6E
USA are searching people’s phones for signs of criticism of government policy. They are detaining and deporting people (even citizens). China is not the sole bogeyman you think it is.
That’s true. I suppose my point is that those things don’t make an additional vulnerability any more palatable.
That why I said “messaging” too.
So if someone is reading a personal email I sent them, in this case it is likely covertly screenshot by Microsoft. I abandoned MS in the early 2000s over privacy concerns and monopolistic behaviour. But I never thought I would think twice about messaging someone with a Windows computer. Here we are.
I wonder if he would even know that Greenland exists if his handlers hadn’t pointed it out to him and said they want it.
There is more that unites us than divides us. In this instance, occupying stolen land 🫂
So some Zionist leaders negotiated the exit of Jewish people from Nazi Germany is what I get from that discussion. Like EU leaders today are negotiating with Trump. Is that the point you’re trying to make? I wouldn’t call Europeans Trump collaborators.
I don’t think that’s right. The Haavara agreement was pragmatic, not ideological. Those groups were not allies and the Nazis targeted all Jews (because it was a racist policy, not a political one).
That is so clever. I’m almost speechless reading the article. He took an estranged community and turned them into role models for the kids.
It would be nice if they expand beyond just men too.
I remember when signage with ads had no lighting. Even that would be an improvement so I’d like to see any kind of illumination gone too.
Why did I have to see this right before bed