Turns out the mods are in that camp, which kinda clips decent disagreements with an anti Putin rule 1 ban for bigotry lol

Speak however you like to someone who just tried to kill you.

But at the end of the day it’s “art” (shitty, copyright infringing, yes.), Or at minimum “media”. When has other media been “grossly negligent” or generally responsible for the acts of the consumers? Aggressive/emotional books or music certainly has joined folks at the moment of their self inflicted demise. Violent video games have certainly been “on the shelf” for some who commit horrible violence. We don’t blame those media for causing what the users do…

Edit to be clear I’m not suggesting mentally unstable folks can’t be seriously impacted by the content they consume. Or that that isn’t a serious issue.

But if a chatbot is held liable for the actions of a user, why wouldn’t a song about ending your life be held to the same standard? I would hope it’s not.

I’ve seen bans there for Calling out horseshoe theory. As if it’s a slur

More traffic plus searchability means more niche communities start to develop actual value.

As in the Lemmy community is a resource of info to the real world hobbits.

I drive a car and think neighborhood speed calming methods are A-OK.

This guy is very brave, but everyone taking about the embassy security drawing weapons when they arrive. Of course they would. They don’t know what was planned, if it was a suicide bombing gone wrong, our whatever else. I’m not pro cop but I don’t understand why people are surprised by this. They are security