If their stated goal was the truth and they wanted to follow the law, yes.

As it is, it’s blatant and intentional voter suppression.

There’s a little bit way down in the article.

The mother and son had their routine call on April 3. Lucy Garzón remembers her son complaining of stomach pains and the poor quality of the jail’s food. He asked her to send money to his commissary account. Garzón-Rayo also said he’d received medical care for stomach issues.

“[Brayan] told me: ‘Mother, it was weird. The doctor told the officer something, and he made a strange face, but they didn’t tell me anything,'” she recalled. Garzón-Rayo asked her, “Can we find out if there was a problem?”

Then they eventually called to say he had attempted suicide by hanging himself, and was in the hospital likely to die.

From those descriptions: At the bare minimum it was 100% negligence, slightly worse covering up negligence, and much worse covering up maltreatment. And I would lean towards the latter if I had to guess.

I apologize for misunderstanding/misquoting. However, I’m not sure why you were even disagreeing with the original comment.

What lawlessness do you feel someone was saying should go unpunished? The only thing they said was that people should not be deported, and I would even read that to mean “without due process” or perhaps “as punishment”.

Did you mean something else by “this type of lawlessness”? I went back and reread several times and I cannot see another interpretation.

“Immigrating illegally -> deport without due process” is the extremist angle. That’s lawlessness that no one should in good conscience support.

I don’t see anyone saying that breaking the law should go unpunished, just that deportation is not an appropriate penalty especially when there are existing more appropriate penalties. That does not seem extreme to me.

I think the problem is the phrasing which seems to absolve the jail of responsibility.

We know it’s a bad situation when the basic elements of the constitution are considered “extreme and radical”

No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

Which dystopian cyberpunk medium depicted this level of hell? This is echoes of Nazi Germany here.

Yeah but this is the US.

You think we’ll be using trains?

shockedpikachu.jpeg

I’d say it’s both, yeah.

But also user demand partly drives what the employer provides, and some people really like those k-cups.

They use k-cups so being inconsiderate is a given.

This cunt should no longer be able to walk the streets

FTFY

If they sound different they’re not lossless. (Or they’re different masters)

I’m with you on the “FOSS office alternatives are shit”, but unfortunately MS office is also shit. Google is the closest I have found to a good office suite but even that is becoming a bit chaotic and awkward. LyX is a promising word processor but also pretty awkward to use in its own way. I’ve got nothing, there.

As far as gaming, this sound less kind than intended but you deserve any shit you get for saying Linux gaming is bad these days. Apart from a few AAA games with anti-cheat where the devs just don’t want to, basically every game just works without any extra effort. Even obscure indie games. I can’t think of the last game I wanted to play that didn’t run on Linux, and often it is better under proton than Windows or native.

Nobody sat down and made a decision to handle country names the way we do.

This is clearly false. There was a definite point at which it was decided to call Burma Myanmar, or at a more local level Peking to Beijing.

Have you tried sfc /scannow?

No, they could and that’s the problem.

Can they test it again please, until they can learn to behave?

Can russia please cut themselves off from the rest of the Internet?