Factorio. Aka cracktorio.

No problem. I get curious myself so figure it nice to share with people that don’t tell me they’re not interested in useless facts.

I am not an eggspert but after a quick search it seems many bird eggs are green in colour due to a pigment called biliverdin.

Interestingly verde is green in Spanish.

That’s eggcelent and I’m eggstatic that you enjoyed. Come back next Easter for more egg facts.

Even with it being much warmer I believe it would still be difficult to keep at a uniform temperature.

Here is what I found:

• The shell must be strong enough to support the egg’s weight and protect the embryo, but thin enough for the chick to break through when hatching.
• As size increases, the weight grows cubically (volume), but shell strength only increases quadratically (surface area), so there’s a point where the shell would have to be too thick to hatch from.
• The distance from the shell to the center increases.
• Oxygen diffusion becomes inefficient, and the embryo could suffocate.
• Larger eggs are harder to keep at a uniform temperature.
• Birds incubating the eggs would need to generate and distribute more heat, which is physically demanding.

Here is what I found:

• The shell must be strong enough to support the egg’s weight and protect the embryo, but thin enough for the chick to break through when hatching.
• As size increases, the weight grows cubically (volume), but shell strength only increases quadratically (surface area), so there’s a point where the shell would have to be too thick to hatch from.
• The distance from the shell to the center increases.
• Oxygen diffusion becomes inefficient, and the embryo could suffocate.
• Larger eggs are harder to keep at a uniform temperature.
• Birds incubating the eggs would need to generate and distribute more heat, which is physically demanding.

I got curious and your assumption is correct for one of the limiting factors.

Here is what I found:

• The shell must be strong enough to support the egg’s weight and protect the embryo, but thin enough for the chick to break through when hatching.
• As size increases, the weight grows cubically (volume), but shell strength only increases quadratically (surface area), so there’s a point where the shell would have to be too thick to hatch from.
• The distance from the shell to the center increases.
• Oxygen diffusion becomes inefficient, and the embryo could suffocate.
• Larger eggs are harder to keep at a uniform temperature.
• Birds incubating the eggs would need to generate and distribute more heat, which is physically demanding.

Crime does pay for many many many people. You living in a fairytale 😂

I’m extremely thankful for this information.

I would blame myself. Then I would blame the machine that misled me. I would meet RFK and shoot him in the face.

What do you do to break them?

In my forties and never broken a headphone jack, headphones, cable, or in fact anything like that. I tend to take care of my stuff and not treat it in such a way as I’m going to break it.

Rather than betting on conjecture you might do well to search for blog posts of security researchers that test these kinds of claims. Then you could have posted that instead of going on feelings.

Like this.

Lawsuit based on research by mysk not sure in the outcome of this though and whether the the claims that there is a difference between data collection for selling to data brokers vs data collection to improve the user experience. As I developer myself we will collect data to help us understand our software better and with no intention to do anything with it.

Another one appears to be about a flaw in how they anonymise data, specifically local differential privacy.

So it does appear that there are claims about opt-in, but I didn’t see anything concrete in my cursory look and I’m not afraid to post articles attacking my own point.

Smoked a hell of a lot of weed and if I got no effect from it then I wouldn’t have kept doing it.

Although, to be honest I’m under no illusion I wouldn’t have self-medicated with something else, earlier than I actually did.

I would be very rich if I had your genes.

Thiel is worse than Musk, he just goes under the radar.

No I doubt it is. I assume that the vast majority of people that go already have wealth.

I mean a not used cigarette and emptying out the tobacco and using the paper from that.

I doubt that is more carcinogenic than thermal paper coated in BPA.

The cancer you get from cigs is the tobacco.

Yeah I’m going to do this at weekend or if I see any on the way home tonight.

Nice.

Does Harvard set up for life as well as I assume or are there people that go and don’t succeed?