• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • For me, open tabs and bookmarks are different levels of the same thing. I’ll open a bunch of tabs researching some task I want to do, and leave them open because I want to come back to that. Bookmarks do the same thing, but with lower visibility and higher permanence.

    Tab groups let me group a handful of things to reduce the clutter. Similar to the way that folders are useful within the bookmarks manager.

    To use them, just drag one tab on top of another, it’ll make a new group. Give it a name, and you can now expand/collapse. So 10 tabs all related to one task can stay in-sight to remind you, but only take up 1 tab’s worth of space in the bar.




  • Far from perfect, but I think it’s good to have a layer that very visibly shows ‘yes, this is the account you want’.

    Domains are a worthwhile addition, but they run into almost the same problem as usernames and handles. Can be made misleading easily - sure, I could often go to the web address and verify it (if they don’t put up a convincing fake site), but that’s much lower visibilty.

    Eg, you can probably register nintendo@nintendoamerico.com or similar and get it by some folks just as easily as registering the Twitter handle. There’s a payment step to get the domain, but that’s about it.

    The centralization problem you mention is a good point though. It was a fine system, if you felt like you could trust Twitter as a verifier. Today obviously, one could not. But Bsky seems to at least theoretically have a ‘choose your verification provider’ idea in mind, which would (again theoretically) resolve a lot of that issue.



  • emb@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlApp Image or AUR package
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I really like App-images. For the most part, they just work, download, run, done. And sometimes you want the flexibility to install something the distro’s pacakage manager doesn’t give you (or doesn’t have the latest version of). It’s a little extra work to put the app in system menus, etc though.

    Package manger still preferred. Having the system deal with updates and dependencies is nice.

    AUR is still good, but I’d take the App Image. Sometimes these work for me, sometimes they don’t. Still have to manually update them, AFAIK.







  • emb@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.worldThoughts on Mario Kart World
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I’m not big on the idea of open world racing. To me, driving between race tracks looks like a chore.

    I’ve seen other racers do it, but I’ve never really delved into a game like that. Maybe once I do I’ll really like it.

    I do think grinding rails and wall jumping around looks pretty fun in MK. But it could end up gimmicky and unexiciting once you’re used to.

    Basically all a big ‘wait and see’ from my perspective.


  • emb@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.worldNintendo Switch 2 Game-Key Card Overview
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Had a scare when first hearing this. But somewhere else on the site it does specify this as something like “some physical games”, and as quoted in OP they’re contrasting here with “regular game cards”. So it looks like real game cards will still be a thing.

    So far I’ve seen screenshots of SFVI and Bravely Default boxarts marked as game-key cards.

    I’ve seen box shots for Mario Kart and Donkey Kong that appear to be normal game cards.


  • emb@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.worldNintendo Switch 2 Game-Key Card Overview
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Seems so. Notably, Switch 1 already has games with a similar warning on the box.

    They’re just giving a name to it.

    On one hand, I’m glad they’re up front about it (and I’d rather see an even uglier, larger warning on the cover for game key cards). On the other, I hope this isn’t a sign that they’re legitimizing it or that it’ll be more common.





  • Yes, seems like such an odd oversight from Google. They want you to subscribe to channels, but after even moderate use over a few years, you end up with a massive list of subscriptions. I guess it’s not actually an oversight, the bad UX (for finding specific content) is probably on purpose, they want to funnel you through their suggestions. But still, surprised they don’t include a way to organize it.

    I use an extension called PocketTube to organize them – but it stores data locally and doesn’t sync very well, so it wouldn’t fit your use case.