Dude, seriously, iCloud backup. What the fuck

Better than the wrench

If you insist…

🧃

Plenty more where that came from!

Can’t give you Reddit gold, so i present Lemmy Juicebox🧃, the highest honor that one can bestow upon a comment or post on Lemmy

All drugs impacted decision-making to some area, including alcohol

Hard disagree. Coke is certainly worse, although… nowhere nearly as destructive as meth or heroin/opioids.

With alcohol and tobacco being legal (and hardly regulated), it tough to draw any lines without seeming both hypocritical and illogical. And with cannabis gaining legality in more and more places, everyone is finally getting the concept that the War on Drugs was lost the day it started.

I’ve known people with extreme serious and terrible cohabits, but they were never any worse off and other people I knew who were professional drunks. And I would include myself in the number of people I know who continue to smoke for decades after knowing exactly how stupid the thing that is.

Ignorance of drugs is what is a problem in our society reacts to their youth. All of the propaganda for nearly a century has blasted everyone with the idea that any kind of drug use is necessarily evil and a gamble with death, even though that is very much not true.

If tobacco and alcohol remain legal, and especially with the growing trend of cannabis legalization, I don’t think it would be unreasonable to legalize possession of small amount of cocaine.

Again, I discussed how I think drugs like methamphetamine and heroin under the opioids should not be legalized, but prohibiting cocaine use, for example, has never decreased its usage. It’s just a tool for cops to Rob citizens, and then claim the spoils for themselves.

You kids might laugh now, but once upon a time, this was a perfectly valid answer that typically elicited wonderment and awe. Once upon a time, the Internet was some inaccessible, mystical land that very few people had access to or even understood. Kind of like Narnia, but without the Christian overtones. A digital image that you downloaded from the Internet was like Marco Polo bringing opium back from China.

Things change, and things remain the same

I disagree. This may be one of the most quintessentially Lemmy posts that I’ve ever seen, lol

The AAUI was an adapter that allowed old-world Macs to connect to ethernet

The best part of these pictures is that all of those other animals are just like “whatevs”

They had that many left?

… or they’re just full of shit

schmear

I see you, bagel slut ;)

Did it work?

Oh, look, Corey Booker is still hot AF

Oh, fuck that. Let everyone see the picture of the woman that the Department of Justice is as fucking. This is a matter of public record, and we should all be witness to it.

What I can imagine is a fair and equitable ecology of media sharing. While some commercial producers - as well and indie ones - would offer their content for free linking (perhaps with a daily/weekly quota), others may work out mass licensing deals with the platform owner. , Even many more others may work out, individualized compensation agreements that fall somewhere in between.

So, FB would pay an annual licensing fee to all of the content producers whose content it profits from.

FB is already built on hundreds of more complex systems that the one required for tracking license payment obligations.

That certainly does sound like a problem for Facebook, and that’s why they told Canada to fuck off and stopped publishing Canadian news.

That doesn’t make it right, and it’s certainly pretty shitty on that part of Facebook, who could easily afford to pay for the content that they make so much money from.

If one company is able to profit from the content/product produced by another, the original company should be fairly compensated. That’s what the law was about, and Facebook decided they didn’t wanna play that game.