My username is a wordplay on the Linux command filesystem check: fsck.

  • 3 Posts
  • 45 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 24th, 2024

help-circle

  • Ah yes, the “splurdge” part of the article, a word everyone knows as a very technical term that’s used for filling in for an inability to articulate an actual line of logic. Instead of logic, just explain that “I don’t like the conclusion of the article, so it must be wrong somehow even though I can’t explain why.”

    It’s also important for people to chime in that an article must be wrong because it just “feels wrong”. Of course don’t actually provide any reasoning for it, because why would that be necessary?

    Don’t forget how useful it is to ask a question, completely ignoring that the article addresses it. Don’t even bring it up in the questioning. When someone points that out, then the best strategy is to lash out at them, because they were such a big meanie by pointing out the obvious problem of not reading the article.

    Lemmy communities are all about feelings, not information!

    Oh, also I took a screenshot of your comment because I knew you were going to edit it.





  • For all the people who keep still saying “no, they are definitely doing it because of this one anecdote that wasn’t even properly tested, but trust me bro it’s real.” (Like Linktank@lemmy.today and RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com)

    Anyone with even a basic understanding of networking can realize how this could be easily tested and proven, especially by the millions of people with deep comprehension, experience, and tools on hand. There is so much incentive to prove this, particularly if the information was then used to sue these companies. So, why hasn’t anyone done this?

    Because what the article says is true. They don’t listen to everyone’s conversations. It’s easier and significantly cheaper to just use the data they have on you to both influence you and predict you.