Good. He’s incompetent, rejects climate science, and causes nothing but disruption - at best. He deserves to be treated the same way he treats the rest of the world.

I don’t care how cheap the tickets get. Actually getting to the plane is enough of a deterrent to keep me away.

“Why am I being arrested for poisoning my family? I only did what I was told at a Truth Seeker’s Conference!”

X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”

Vague, overly broad laws are indeed a problem; I’m willing to give him that. ONLY that.

Unfortunately for Musk, this is not vague. If the footage is something you created or manipulated, you know perfectly damn well whether it’s legal or not. He’s trying to confuse the issue, and conflate fraud with free speech. Hopefully, the court will see right through him.

I didn’t think of that. Good point.

Still, it might be worth considering if you’re (A) an idiot, and (B) keep getting turned down by those picky would-be parents who insist that you don’t smoke or drink while pregnant.

Do you get the $5,000 bonus even if you immediately put the child up for adoption? For some people, going this route could be more profitable than the pyramid scheme they call their “side hustle”.

I’m scared. This doesn’t seem like a terrible idea… but it’s coming from a complete jackass. Am I the one who’s losing it?

Good. Show some resistance. Help drive home that Trump can’t do what he wants unopposed.

Elump will accomplish this not by improving technology or software, but by outlawing any safety regulations that prove inconvenient.

Huh. Interesting! Thanks!

They’re walking the fine line between being shitty enough that you have to refine your search multiple times (thus allowing them to show you more ads), but not being SO shitty that you give up and never come back.

Heat is an excellent movie, and one of my top five. Coincidentally, I just watched it last night. For a film released in 1998, it has aged well. OOP is in the ballpark, too - a young Natalie Portman is in it, not Jolie.

If you must live in (or near) this town full of dumbasses, make sure to rent, not buy. Also, try to get a place on the 2nd floor.

Yeah. Of course, I feel sorry for him, but when he stole in front of a camera he had to know about, well…

But… I’m confused. Didn’t Musk call empathy a weakness? Surely someone so tolerant, inclusive, and humble couldn’t be wrong.

Yes, arson is a crime, and rightly so. “Decades behind bars”, however, for setting two cars on fire (and damaging two charging stations) is insanely disproportionate. There’s a very important reason that not all infractions are sentenced to the maximum possible extent:

If the government is going to drop any pretense of mercy or sanity, then there’s no reason why people shouldn’t take their time, plan things carefully, and destroy the whole dealership. People who would otherwise do less damage are taking note. Sure, some will be scared away, but I think more will be emboldened. Maybe I’m wrong, but it doesn’t matter. Either way, the end result will be worse.

The government is basically telling people that prosecutors won’t be reasonable, so you might as well make sure the crime is truly worthy of the punishment. I cannot overemphasize what a terrible idea this is.

Huh. I always took the term “lost cause” at face value, and thought it simply meant that the confederacy was hopeless and doomed to fail. I didn’t realize it was based on hypocrisy and lies. Thanks for the heads up!

Edit: the more I read that Wikipedia page, the angrier I get

Nice work, OP!

“It was malpractice on the side of Harvard’s lawyers not to pick up the phone and call the members of the antisemitism task force who they had been talking to for weeks,” said May Mailman, the White House senior policy strategist. “Instead, Harvard went on a victimhood campaign.”

“Malpractice”? “Victimhood campaign”? Go fuck yourself, May.

Thanks for the warning. Click saved.