You’re half-right.

It’s real, researched, well-produced journalism which is definitely a relic of the past at this point.

I don’t think that’s what you were saying, though. Since your opinion hinges on what “people have been calling” it, I think you probably don’t watch it and believe that since it’s an old show and format, it must be inferior to… sound bites, inflammatory remarks, click/rage-bait, “X slammed Y,” etc.

And that’s sad.

That’s not true.

It was also fun watching his leg break.

^ this person isn’t worth anyone’s time or effort. Ignore and/or block and don’t fall into the trap of trying to use logic to change the mind of someone who didn’t use logic to get there.

Jesus Christ this thread is full of people who don’t realize they’re the judging hipster in the post.

Ubuntu isn’t the entry level distro that you move on from once you’ve gotten your feet wet, and your not very subtle pats on your own backs for using something different aren’t earned.

Does it do everything the user needs from it? If so, don’t tell them that they need to “graduate” to a “better” flavor.