I mean what’s the point of “self” hosting then?
If you have to be a professional server administrator to host one of these services, then why even have a self hosting community as opposed to just a hosting community for server admins to discuss how to set and configure various services? Is this community dedicated to just discussing the uniqueness of managing a home server without a static IP?
Self hosting is just an extension of open source software. It’s only goal is being able to run your own backends of apps to not be exploited by major companies. It’s goal is not to be a niche technical hobby, if that’s your goal in its own right, then get a model train or a Warhammer set.
Mainstream consumers don’t know words “Plex” and “Home Assistant” either.
Yes, they do lol. It’s flat out weird to think that the only people who have ever heard of pirating are software developers and server admins who use the command line.
You’re viewing this through an incredibly skewed lense. The average person will never even consider self hosting nor will care, if anything the average person prefers cloud services.
The only lens I’m viewing this through is one that dares to imagine that the Venn diagram of “computer users savvy enough to care about privacy” isn’t 100% contained within the circle of “computer users savvy with the terminal”.
Quite frankly your stance that the ‘average person’ doesn’t care, when this post is LITERALLY from an ‘average person’ who does, is the one that seems off base on its face.
Notice that it hasn’t amongst mainstream consumers.
You know what self hosted projects have been successes? Plex and Home Assistant. You know what projects don’t require the terminal? Plex and Home Assistant.
Self hosting is doomed until this isn’t the answer.
Sort of, when you hang out with people who are less informed, it’s going to get awkward if you’re constantly just explaining stuff. Eventually everyone will pick up on the vibe that you know way more than everyone else.
But I don’t hate it. That stuff can be overcome by working on your self and social ability, often the wittiest people can slyly point out the folly of something someone said with a quick wry joke, and more importantly you can learn to just let stuff go and not always explain everything or make sure everyone is exactly right about everything, and instead focus on being a conversationalist that will just keep things flowing in a fun way.
Plus, then when you do hang out with other people who are well informed, you can have interesting deep conversations. And the world is a lot less scary and hard to navigate if you understand how it all works.
I’m not talking ecosystem or which I’d choose to build an actual project with, just on a pure language basis, C#'s typing system is more flexible and less verbose than Java’s, and unlike Java, C# actually treats functional programming as first class.
Java has certainly gotten better in both regards, but C# was really just a joy in comparison.
C# is just flat out objectively better language, in virtually every single way
If you can’t imagine why this is bad, maybe read some Kafka or watch some Black Mirror.
Lmfao. Yeah, ok, let’s get my predictions from the depressing show dedicated to being relentlessly pessimistic at every single decision point.
And yeah, like I said, you sound like my hysterical middle school teacher claiming that Wikipedia will be society’s downfall.
Guess what? It wasn’t. People learn that tools are error prone and came up with strategies to use them while correcting for potential errors.
Like at a fundamental, technical level, components of a system can be error prone, but still be useful overall. Quantum calculations have inherent probabilities and errors in them, but they can still solve some types of calculations so much faster than normal computers that you can run the same calculation 100x on a Quantum Computer, average out the results to remove the outlying errors, and get to the right answer far faster than a classical computer.
Computer chips in satellites and the space station are constantly having random bits of memory flipped by cosmic rays, but they still work fine because their RAM is error-correcting ram, that can use similar methods to verify and check for errors.
And at a super high level, some of my friends and coworkers are more reliable than others, that doesn’t mean the ones that are less reliable aren’t helpful, it just means I have to take what they say with a grain of salt.
Designing for error correction is a thing, and people are perfectly capable of doing so in their personal lives.
Yes, they literally are. Or maybe you haven’t heard of human caused climate change?
But a) they don’t refuse, most will tell you if you prompt them well them and b) you cannot rely on them as the sole source of truth but an information machine can still be useful if it’s right most of the time.
My friends would probably say something like “I’ve never heard that one, but I guess it means something like …”
Ok, but the point is that lots of people would just say something and then figure out if it’s right later.
The problem is, these LLMs don’t give any indication when they’re making stuff up versus when repeating an incontrovertible truth. Lots of people don’t understand the limitations of things like Google’s AI summary* so they will trust these false answers. Harmless here, but often not.
Quite frankly, you sound like middle school teachers being hysterical about Wikipedia being wrong sometimes.
“Regurgitation without critical thought is fundamentally counter to the principles of science and engineering”
Their office is downtown, go down and ask to talk to someone. Don’t leave until they ask you to.
You have no obligation not to inconvenience them.
Search for the company on LinkedIn, click through its employees. Have them get a bunch of ‘Appeared in Searches’ notifications from LinkedIn. Make sure they feel seen by a bunch of their fellow citizens.
Try this on your friends, make up an idiom, then walk up to them, say it without context, and then say “meaning?” and see how they respond.
Pretty sure most of mine will just make up a bullshit response nd go along with what I’m saying unless I give them more context.
There are genuinely interesting limitations to LLMs and the newer reasoning models, and I find it interesting to see what we can learn from them, this is just ham fisted robo gotcha journalism.
PC Gamer regurgitating the abstract of a random research paper makes baby jesus cry.
Social media said Mark Zuckerberg was over and sadly I think neither are right.
I would rather a law that extends many of the properties of physical ownership to digital sales.
‘Average person’ was in quotes because it’s the language you used to describe someone not comfortable with the command line.