Sounds like I won’t be using Vanilla because that (obsidian + synching + tailscale) is definitely my primary need.

The last time I played with it, I just remember thinking, cool - but why?

I dunno about that, but there is a bit in there about burning bulls testicles to appease the lord god

That’s fair, there’s other angles of observation made available already.

Seeing as you like speculating about cyberpunk, how about if observation is just the initial way to way to sell the drone cloud? Depending on how cheap you can make them, there’s an argument to made for reducing time-to-intercept for low-speed aerial objects.

If you’ve got a bunch of drones overhead already, you could run one in to the path of a kamikaze drone, or if your swarm is even lightly armed, you can extend engagement range and reduce required accuracy with a single buckshot shell to shoot an offending drone down.

If you’re content to prioritize executive safety over public saftey, there’s a lot that can be done.

Drone displays terrify me.

Not to mention, the minute it happens, the government will carpet the skies with observation drones in the name of safety

Just a little piece

That’s what I was thinking, I know the pain of watching something run for ages, only to finally get past where it failed last time and run straight in to another stumbling block.

I don’t envy you having to work in an SELinux environment with less than stellar developer understanding of policies and contexts.

Is it not possible to run it in audit mode in dev and have it tell you what the would have blocked?

Quad9. Swiss based, dnssec available, has beaten blocking orders by Sony before.

They’re about as open as resolvers get, and they pretty much released everything they could when courts tried to interfere with them.

This article is basically referencing the same event as OPs article, but after Canal+ expanded the scope of their legal challenge.

And a dnssec policy will solve that for you

Devils on horseback!

Username checks out