• 1 Post
  • 252 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 14th, 2025

help-circle








  • I’m not quite sure what you mean to imply.

    The topic of marriage did come up 6 years ago when we decided to have kids. At that time we decided it didn’t have much meaning for us.

    We didn’t really think about her family name at that time.

    When the kids were born she was emphatic that they should have my family name. She actually has a family name from a previous marriage, which wouldn’t be appropriate for our kids, and she’s estranged from her actual family so didn’t want her maiden name.

    Since the kids have been born this has been in the back of my mind and I’ve been meaning to address it, I assume it’s on her mind too.

    Honestly, just attending to all the things that need to be done in the last 2 years has been very challenging. This just hasn’t been a priority.

    Also for context, de facto relationships have legal standing in Australia. So the law treats us as though we were married. Our situation is not uncommon.

    I mentioned it to my sisters who suggested she could just use my family name as an alias, or just change her name to our family name, or we could elope. If she wanted to hyphenate that would be up to her of course but knowing her as I do I doubt she will want to.






  • I don’t have any credible feedback for you.

    I dislike php. That’s my feeling. The vibe.

    When I’m browsing self hostable things I avoid php unless it’s really the only option.

    My completely unsupported “feeling” is that apps written in php are awkward and clunky and just less pleasant to host.

    I’m sorry if that offends you, and I don’t care at all what you think of my opinion.

    I only mentioned “php apps feel old” because I could see you were some kind of php devotee and that it would trigger you. Maybe look into that.







  • Lets back up the truck a little.

    Sounds like a cool idea, why don’t you set it up?

    This sarcastic little witticism required a sarcastic and witty response, which I provided.

    Obviously I’m not going to set it up because, as I said in my earlier comments it’s a dreamy idea. I could go on to say, in the absence of such a technological solution, archive.org should still refrain from copyright infringement because they quite obviously aren’t viable with their current stance.

    you’re licking the boots of record companies

    You’ll have to help me understand how this is so. In my comments I laid out a plan to maintain archive.org’s data for no (or very little) cost or effort, while ensuring that those record company’s receive nothing.

    For users, the value of archive.org is the data. However, that data has no value to litigators nor anyone else. You can literally let the existing organisation collapse, and take the data to form a new organisation.

    If you want to interpret this plan as doing “nothing at all” then you’re free to do so.

    However, and forgive me this final sarcasm, doing nothing at all would be more productive than a change.org petition.