Or we could stop gamifying slaughter and stop giving soldiers medals, and use the money to pay for healthcare.

They’re not leaving the collection as they were not part of the collection.

A rare lucid moment

Satire doesn’t have to be “funny”. I think you’re running into the rigidity of your expectations.

You’d have to work pretty hard to get drunk on small beer.

Then they’ll still need border guards, soldiers, police, judges. The “good German soldier” myth was created because if every Nazi were to be prosecuted, the nation would be paralysed.

So you didn’t get it. That’s fine. It’s a satire of southern megachurches, and how they are continuing the same con and the confederacy.

It was getting attention in 2018 too. John Oliver even did an episode about it. People just don’t care as long as it isn’t them.

This has been going on for many years.

Event of the decade in Worcestershire. If they had anything else to do they’d be doing that.

This is the first outfit of a steam locomotive with ETCS Level 2, and required a bespoke installation and ballistic benchmarking hence the length and cost (£9 million!) of the project.

They were part of a land grab that took it from the Spanish along with Guam and some other places. Gained independence in 1946.

Lack of hostile land grabs? West of the Mississippi, Texas, Hawaii and the Philippines would beg to differ.

Wow, what foresight they had to appease Trump 6 years before he was elected… This law was written in 2010. The ruling clarified that a more recent Scottish law which relied on this one did so by misinterpreting that law’s definition of women.

As to Chamberlain, at the time of the Munich agreement, the Luftwaffe had the most advanced air force in the world, while the RAF were only equipped with biplanes. Chamberlain bought time for the development and manufacture of armaments, significantly the Spitfire and Hurricane, and in the event it was just enough time, with losses in the Battle of Britain barely being outstripped by replacements. So yeah, turned out alright.

The Supreme Court doesn’t make the rules, it makes a determination on what the rules mean in context of the body of law. It’s not their fault that Parliament passed a badly worded law. It’s a positive step that the law has been clarified, and now the changes needed can be identified.

There were people held without trial at Guantanamo Bay concentration camp for 20 years, with the military acknowledging they were completely innocent when they were captured (some were children) but that they couldn’t be released in case they now hated America (for some reason idk).

You absolutely shouldn’t do this, but one Japanese operator was caught running a nuclear plant where the only people on the night shift were cleaners, who hadn’t even been told what their radiation badges were. They got a minor fine.

Never was.

Good thing russian hackers don’t know how to get into a database

So they’ll be open sourcing all their algorithms right? Right?