My keyboard doesn’t have that many symbols.

I concede.

==

Eventually, we’ll run out of these and enter proper discourse, with full sentences and long words.

I had the intuition these would be for medication.

But that raises another question: are these labels only manufactured by one entity?

Still not enough.

That is not enough!

What type of products would be getting these?

Cernunnos descent failed.

And give him free atention? Nah.

Just say “I wish for this man, his ideas and his life work to slide into disregard and irrelevance and become nothing more than a footnote on idiocy”.

There is the probability that OP could be watching their own conception. Doesn’t get more instructional than that.

I live in an area where fires are frequent and aerial cables plentiful.

Once in a while, a crew comes around and picks up all the broken cable. But considering these are mostly glass, non insulated cables, I’d risk it just becomes another inert part of the soil.

Hopefully, there will be a retrieval plan, after all the madness ends.

The last one broke ground with his name/title. I liked it.

Wasn’t there a pope called Leo?

That is simply awful to read.

Can’t imagine her thoughts on equality

Pius number something. Pious… yeah. Missed that mark.

That’s a nice thought. Charitable. Wishing to see hell empty, as in without anyone there.

That’s Easter. But since you mention it, there was a time when coal was to be given to the bad kids, which by default were all the non-white and not poor kids.

Bigoted enough for you? I grew up still listening echos of that shit.

I think it is mandatory. There is a very precise rite to declare a pope as deceased.

I was taughy any sentence fragment between commas is added, yet not vital, information to a sentence, capable of being removed without taking away any crucial information conveied.

It fits the rules.

And, commas also act as a way to convey the rithym you intend your sentences to be read.

I have a really hard time reading english and not feel rushed to do it.

There is being atheist and there is being anti-theist.

The way you express yourself, it seems you lean more into the second. Which I find intriguing because in order to be anti-theist, you first need to give any value to the theist claims.

As you do seem very invested in supporting and uplifting those that are wronged by a creed, why do you opt to attack any and all believer, by default, instead of trying to find people that share your exact concerns?

It doesn’t matter if someone takes Santa Claus, the Krampus, the Easter Bunny or the Tooth Fairy as real or if they hold the hope of meeting again their loved ones after they die. People are here, today, living, breathing, suffering.

The bending and changing of those same “holy” precepts is what allows people to diverge abd evolve the way they understand others and the world.

Anti-theism fell out of favour in the 2010’s. Too much vitriol. Reason does not cancel hope and dreams but it should cancel hollow arguments, including those reason itself raises.