Ya, kinda and it is a pretty funny answer. Jack uses a slightly different process called the Lincoln county process. Basically, they filter it through charcoal made from maple wood.

That still meets the requirements for Bourbon, but they wanted to have their own “Tennessee whiskey” definition that includes the Lincoln process. Although, I don’t know who else uses it other than them and Dickle.

So, ya, bourbon subset that doesn’t want to be called bourbon because it’s Tennessee whiskey. Lol.

Ya, that’s because it’s not Bourbon. Which kinda proves the point, right.

Lol, what? You are just riding on some xenophobia tip or something. You know the fact that there is a ton of American whiskey that is not called bourbon kinda disproves your whole prejudice, right? Whatever, keep stewing in it I guess.

Yes, it must be made in the us. Scotch also has to be made in Scotland. But nobody is out here saying it’s Scottish ego. They just know the flavor profile of scotch. But you can make similar things elsewhere, true.

No, not all whiskeys are required to be fermented in a new charred oak barrels. That’s what produces the typical smokey flavor associated with bourbon. All bourbon is whiskey, but not all whiskey is bourbon. That’s like saying all other grain whiskey that doesn’t use corn is Scotch.

Straight bourbon is required to be 51% corn, aged in chared oak barrels for at least 2 years, and must be at least 80 proof.

Of course none of that makes it better, because it’s just preferences like anything else anyway. But bourbon is its own thing.

It’s ok, you don’t seem to have the capability that others did.

Most probably not. Although it does happen.

That anecdote has been around for a long time. But they all hired somebody. Probably somebody without 5 years exp.

I understand what you’re saying and I’m not certain either.

But, given that the context is a response to concern, it makes it sound like they’re suggesting that she’s gunning for the outcome. Like “don’t worry about them they’re all setup now.” A nobody who is now a champion of liberalism.

It just reads weird. Maybe they are just an ernest doomer who believes nobody is employable, but also thinks that everything will work out here. Stranger things have happened. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Right? The framing of that comment is very strange. Suspicious even.

That’s also weird, though. “Like the rest of us” means nothing, plenty are employable, a vast majority are actually.

So, to assume they “probably went from unemployable” to winning the job lottery with a nonprofit is certainly a take.

Weird to assume she is unemployable too, tbh.

What the actual fuck. That was not defending anything of the sort. You tried to compare full body and face tattoos to the numbers tattooed on Jewish prisoners at Auschwitz. And took criticism of that dumb statement as a defense of the actions taken by the trump admin. Which it was not.

Then you tried to defend that by lying and saying that there were people tatooed that way there, too.

And now you have the nerve to try and frame it as defending foreign imprisonment because you are a moron who got called out on thier bullshit. So, congrats.

The fed is not federal despite the name. And the current chair sits until 2026.

Just move it to stuff that guarantees 40% plus. 2ez. git gud. /s

It’s because some people don’t actually support workers, especially creative workers, regardless or their political identity.

abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice on the basis of ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or most importantly against people who have just the worst takes.

Hmmm, checks out. I guess the technology platform, YouTube, should get right on that too.

I’m sad now.

Too true, and my problem is about to be your problem and the cycle continues comrade.