• mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It was the most ridiculous and infuriatingly hard game back then, by a margin. It almost made Ghosts and Ghouls look easy in comparison.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      That was by design, actually. A lot of the old arcade games were like that.

      It was to get people to either quit after a bit of playing so a new person could step in and give the machine money, or have the person who lost at the hard level put more money in.

      Otherwise at just a quarter the machines become unprofitable. Just capitalism things.

      • mrfriki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean sure, but played my fair share off arcades back in the day and some would eat your quarters faster than others and games too difficult like this one didn’t attract much attention even if they were flashy one because we kids were broke AF.

        • Seleni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Honestly not sure. Haven’t been to an arcade in years.

          I should go to one again.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah. It was a stupidly hard game. With unlimited lives (ie unlimited quarters) the entire thing is only a 25 minute play through.