• ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Let’s have a writing contest, you guys. Now that a Trump appointee is against it, let’s all think up reasons for why subsidized high-fructose corn syrup sold as food is not only a good thing but actually a basic human right.

      • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m not saying we should ban these things, I’m just saying we shouldn’t be subsidizing them and purchasing them with public funds. If poor people want to buy this stuff with their own money that’s their right.

        • lemming741@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Ditching subsidies is a start.

          I would tax them into oblivion like cigarettes. Hits the poor first still, but it would shift consumption habits rather than ban them outright.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m just saying we shouldn’t be subsidizing them and purchasing them with public funds.

          Then start with the ag subsidies, not the tiny joy that poor people can wring from life.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s a nanny state. Sure, candy and soda is bad for you, and america has an obesity problem, but I’m against this.

      Just give people money and let them buy what they want / need.

      I’m tired of pedophiles and gay homophobes shaming poor people for having a soda and a candy bar. (Edit: not my intention to associate lgbtq with pedophiles, but it seems a lot of homophobes are into it. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with being gay, but republifuckers need to mind their own business in general and stop judging others for the behaviors they are ashamed to participate in themselves.)

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s a nanny state.

        I mean yea, but so is giving you money for food. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect that the food you get with it to be nutritious.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Just give them money, I don’t care if they want hookers and blow

          It’s none of your business what poor people spend their money on.

            • DancingBear@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              lol… I’m just tired of people trying to gate keep basic needs as though they somehow know better than poor people what they need.

              If we checked what government subsidized millionaires and billionaires spent their money 10% as much as how we do poor people we could actually save money……

              Food stamps and wic and other programs are generally less than a couple hundred dollars. It’s not your business what they spend it on.