Germany’s spy agency BfV has labeled the entirety of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as an extremist entity.

The BfV domestic intelligence agency, which is in charge of safeguarding Germany’s constitutional order, said the announcement comes after an “intense and comprehensive” examination.

“The ethnicity-and ancestry-based conception of the people that predominates within the party is not compatible with the free democratic order,” the BfV said on Friday.

Hopefully this inspires the other parties to to start the process to see the AfD banned. I know the report might not look like much, because of how obvious the findings are. But previous attempts at banning them have failed because such an official report was missing. So maybe our political system starts getting its shit together.

As we say in Germany: Hope dies last

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    AfD are Nazis in all but name. How is it they remain unprosecuted in a nation where swastikas and the Hitler salute are outlawed?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      People get really jumpy about going against public political choice in a democracy, which is fair, but I think there’s been error in the other direction.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They’re not just nazis, they’re nazis sponsored and funded by putin.

      This is documented, but racists would rather support their literal enemy than dare accept changing their worldview in any way.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Foreign anti-interference laws address your first point. If they arent effective, thats easily resolved in parliment.

        Don’t conflate foreign interest with genuine opposition, I would be very surprised if there wasnt any. This is the Democratic system working. The hubris of the left is suicidal.

        • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Foreign anti-interference laws address your first point. If they arent effective, thats easily resolved in parliment.

          They’re not, they need to be reviewed and improved.

          Especially since it’s hard to legislate out foreign influence as they are, by definition, foreign.

          It’s not that there is no genuine opposition, it’s that the amount of effort needed to tip the scales is surprisingly small.

          Understand these tools were developed to control totalitarian societies, influencing democracies is trivial in comparison.

          • futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Especially since it’s hard to legislate out foreign influence as they are, by definition, foreign.

            You punish those in your country who are selling out to foreign influence.

            • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Great, I agree.

              But how do you know?

              Whats the difference between normal, violent racism of your worthless trash, and right wing hate inspired by Russian trolls to divide the west?

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        “In trouble” in this case is bad press. OP was commenting on prosecution given other stuff that’s illegal in Germany. Or did I miss someone getting arrested for the poster?

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Iirc they asked how is it and the article goes into it and go figure it’s the Elon “we didn’t know no better” excuse. They just barely skirt what is and isn’t legal and from what I hear they have a legal team that helps them stay just inside the law while still being outwardly nazi-esk.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      One of the main contributors is probably that the last time they tried banned an extremist party on the right (the NPD) it didn’t work because they didn’t present enough evidence according to the courts, that made everyone involved hesitant this time (or at least that is the excuse they used). Or rather, it failed twice, once because they had agents within the party and the other time for lack of evidence. Obviously obtaining that evidence without running into the first problem again is tricky.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Small correction: the NPD was not banned because they were largely irrelevant. They had little to no influence on politics, which is why the court argued that a ban would be inappropriate.