• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You do realize this exact system has been utilized everywhere in the world for decades without issue? The alternative is completely sealed pavement so what exactly do you propose to improve this? You wanna have the car lanes back?

    • shoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Saying sealed pavement is the only alternative is a false dichotomy. Off the top of my head, gravel ballast has been used for centuries.

      A quick search shows 30x maintenence costs for minimal drainage benefits.

      Civil engineering isn’t one size fits all and I’m sure there are some climates + layouts where this makes sense. But I’d prefer putting that green space somewhere where people can use it and minimize the cost, focus and footprint of transportation infrastructure as much as possible.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        is a false dichotomy

        The two options are green or gray and depressing. The cost of maintaining it wont even show up on the chart compared to the operating cost of the tram network so that shouldnt be an issue.

        • shoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The options are how you spend your money. Improving tree density can have more benefits for the same budget spend. If that’s the case, keep my tram gray and let me hear more birds.