• 23 Posts
  • 282 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle





  • grue@lemmy.worldtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldWhat is Docker?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    A program isn’t just a program: in order to work properly, the context in which it runs — system libraries, configuration files, other programs it might need to help it such as databases or web servers, etc. — needs to be correct. Getting that stuff figured out well enough that end users can easily get it working on random different Linux distributions with arbitrary other software installed is hard, so developers eventually resorted to getting it working on their one (virtual) machine and then just (virtually) shipping that whole machine.





  • We give breathalyzer lockouts to DUI convicted citizens. Why? Because they’ll drive anyway. You can pull licenses all you want, but when driving is required to live, the people will drive. And they’ll do it even when they’re a raging alcoholic.

    Frankly, if we’re going to be fucking with people’s property rights anyway, I think it would actually be better public policy to confiscate the whole car. First of all, it forcibly creates another pedestrian, and therefore increases public support for non-car infrastructure. Second, asserting this right to control parts of people’s property and prohibiting them from modifying it without taking it away completely creates this weird “in-between” kind of ownership that leads to creeping expansion of infringement and has bad implications for things like Right to Repair, etc. I mean, you proved my point yourself: (paraphrased) “we already do it for breathalyzer lockouts, so that must mean it’s okay.” When does it end?

    Judges can remove a person’s right to drive too

    That has never been a right, except on private land that the driver owns. Driving in public has always been a privilege.