• eatthecake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t own or want a car. My housemate drives me to work. It’s a 7 minute drive, 50 minutes by public transport. You need to put on 10 minute buses on multiple routes through every suburb 24hrs to make public transport a viable option for most people.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem with transit is more about how cities are designed, zoned, and built. If we built cities for people instead of cars the vast majority of people in a city would likely have faster commutes on transit than driving a private vehicle.

      Other things can help with this as well such as transit signal priority.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s a 7 minute drive, i practically live in the same suburb. I also work evening shift. Are you going to put on a bus to everywhere for those 250 people who finish work at 230am? Must all of us work and live next door? I try to live as close as possible but you cant ask everyone to do that. A job change shouldnt mean you are required to move house. Its just not feasible for a city of millions to move every time they change jobs. And its not feasible to put on a bus service so me and a couple of others can get home at 230am.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re right, it isn’t feasible to always use a bus, thats why walking, cycling, trams, and light rail should also be used. The biggest problem is density. Low density makes it very difficult to effeciently service, yet many north american zoning and building codes make it very difficult to build any housing that isn’t detached single family homes with minimum parking standards and set backs.

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            walking, cycling, trams, and light rail

            Ableism much? These options don’t suit a bunch of people.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Ableism much?

              No. There are many more disabilities that prevent operation of a car compared to using a train or tram, so the status quo of car supremacy is far more ableist.

              • Cypher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                No one said the individual being accommodated had to be the one operating the vehicle.